I hear ya. It's not that I'm definitely against the idea of having set
roles in a relationship, because that's up to personal preference. It's
just that, y'know, Zhao Zi SAID he wanted to top, and Jack says fine, and
then doesn't let ZZ do it, just tells him, "Well, you're ON TOP of me, so
you're topping." Whut. If you didn't want it, you could say so, and you two
could have a serious discussion about it, but misleading your partner (just
because he's naive and depends on you for sexual knowledge*, or BECAUSE of
that) -- well, I disagree with your decision and action. By you I mean him.
^_^;
*Also, ZZ should google more about sex, heh.
It's a bit unsettling how the writer tries to portray Jack as someone
trying to break away from his previous life/outlook to someone who has,
well, been transformed by falling in love with ZZ - and yet is still
manipulative like this?
no subject
I hear ya. It's not that I'm definitely against the idea of having set roles in a relationship, because that's up to personal preference. It's just that, y'know, Zhao Zi SAID he wanted to top, and Jack says fine, and then doesn't let ZZ do it, just tells him, "Well, you're ON TOP of me, so you're topping." Whut. If you didn't want it, you could say so, and you two could have a serious discussion about it, but misleading your partner (just because he's naive and depends on you for sexual knowledge*, or BECAUSE of that) -- well, I disagree with your decision and action. By you I mean him. ^_^;
*Also, ZZ should google more about sex, heh.
It's a bit unsettling how the writer tries to portray Jack as someone trying to break away from his previous life/outlook to someone who has, well, been transformed by falling in love with ZZ - and yet is still manipulative like this?