![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Apr. 5th, 2017 11:44 pmI should be grading homework instead...
Am mostly undecided what to do about LJ's most recent bout of cray-cray, will probably let it be out of pure apathy rather than delete. (Also, sentimentality.) Besides, by the time it's come to this stage, it's not as if I care that enough about LJ that I wish to signal my displeasure by deleting or whatever. I use LJ (and DW) for mostly fannish stuff anyway.
You're not even worth my token protest, LJ.
(But can I still crosspost? ETA: Looks like a no. Oh, well.)
***
Unfannishly:
I really do wonder how this concept of "genetic affinity" will develop in the future. Not that I'm mocking the concept, because I do sense what the judge wants to articulate and sympathise with it, but in a purely clinical sense the so-called DNA link seems so... clinical?
Am mostly undecided what to do about LJ's most recent bout of cray-cray, will probably let it be out of pure apathy rather than delete. (Also, sentimentality.) Besides, by the time it's come to this stage, it's not as if I care that enough about LJ that I wish to signal my displeasure by deleting or whatever. I use LJ (and DW) for mostly fannish stuff anyway.
You're not even worth my token protest, LJ.
(But can I still crosspost? ETA: Looks like a no. Oh, well.)
***
Unfannishly:
I really do wonder how this concept of "genetic affinity" will develop in the future. Not that I'm mocking the concept, because I do sense what the judge wants to articulate and sympathise with it, but in a purely clinical sense the so-called DNA link seems so... clinical?